July 25, 2010

Tip vortex condensations, contrails and chemtrails (The KC-10 USAF case)

The "tip vortex condensations" or sometimes "wingtip vortices" or "trailing vortices" must not to be confused with the contrails and indeed the reference to "aerodynamic" contrails is blatantly misleading. [1]

As you can see, unless you are liars or stupid (but we know that the hoaxers lie by contract), the phenomenon resumed in the movie of the KC-10 USAF is undoubtedly not attributable to "wingtip vortices" and this for several reasons.

In fact the contrails that hoaxers describe do not exist, since a "contrail" necessarily stems from a sudden rush between an extremely hot (the motor) and an extremely cold and humid (environment). The classic trail of condensation (contrail) must not be confused with the aerodynamic vortices. These are two different physical phenomena.

Long ago, we already treated the subject in this article [HERE]

To combat the mistification of aerodynamic contrails, which is used to diminish the importance of the purpose of the pilot movie "USAFFEKC1O" and then deny that the tanker is engaged in an illegal, aerosol operation is simple, using documents and films presented by the same misinformation.

Here's the text of the article of a notorious "debunking" site in which, about aerodynamic contrails, refers:

[...] The pressure drop is, of course, larger above than below the wing, which results in the uplift that carries the aircraft. [...] Although the cooling on the upper side is stronger, it is still substantial on the lower side. [...] Then, however, the supersaturation reaches much larger values above the wing than below the wing.

So it's written that the aerodynamic effect must be greater on the top surface of the wing, because it is well known that where the pressure decreases, lift increases.

Literally ...

[...] The decrease in pressure is naturally greater than under the wing that gives the plane lift. [...] While the temperature on the top of the wing is very low, is still considerable on the bottom. [...] In any event, the supersaturation reaches higher values above the wing than below.

In fact our friend Fabio found some movies that show effectively those aerodynamic contrails:

Condensation & HD Wing Vortices (time 0: 50, 2: 20, 3: 20)
(1080p) Wing Condensation Landings (time 0: 0: 45, 14, 1: 07, 1: 50 pm)
Trailing Arrival Virgin B747-400 Gatwick 08R (time 0: 32)

What distinguishes the so-called aerodynamic contrails (which aren't contrails) from condensation trails? As shown in the movies, they appear extremely short, dense, don't createiridescence and mainly focused on the top of the wing. This is due to the pressure difference between the bottom and top of the wing area.

The question is the following: "Why there is a pressure difference between the top and bottom of the surface of the wings?". The answer is simple: "during the landing, flaps are lowered and the strong brakes are brought to their profile, in order to permit the aircraft to rapidly decelerate and to get a better stability on the track. In these circumstances, especially in the presence of high humidity and low temperatures, aerodynamic vortices shall become visible, generating, for the reasons described above, a big flow of water droplets defined 'wingtip vortex'".

There are other cases when wingtip vortices may form. These special aerodynamic effects often occur during aerial manoeuvres and/or abrupt or rapid changes of direction. In the case of hunting, for example, a so-called "evasive maneuver" leading the aircraft to a sudden change of trim and speed, can generate aerodynamic vortices similar to what we see during landing of commercial aircrafts.

The common denominator is, precisely, the sudden variation of an aerodynamic profile. How do you get an aerodynamic profile change? With lowering flaps and with the extraction of dropping. It is also important to highlight an important detail: the physical phenomenon that creates aerodynamic vortices determines that the most affected by air flow defined "wingtip vortex" is the top of the wings and fuselage. In short, where there is a sudden variation of airfoil, cannot occur the wingtip vortex.

At this point, let's see the KC-10 tanker video whose importance the hoaxers desperately tried to deny. We see that U.S.A.F. fottage the upper wing is perfectly clean. No upper wing vortices on the edges. This is crucial and moreover could not be otherwise, beacause the KC-10 is in regular flight planning, has not lowered the flaps (could not be otherwise, beacause of the speed). The aircraft is not in turn, is not in landing configuration, is making acrobatic manoeuvres! Trails that it produces are visibly underside of the wings ( tip vortex condensations "get dirty" the top of the wings), forming a chemtrail that starts from the bottom of the wings.

Trails produced from KC-10 are also iridescent and not because of the reflection of hypothetical droplets of water, but because of double rifraction. In fact, the phenomenonr double refraction does not ever happen with the vapour, which causes the phenomenon of refraction and reflection. Very fine particles suspended in the atmosphere generates fields of interference around each particle. Light rays are divided twice. This phenomenon especially occurs with quartz, copper, aluminium etc.

The movie shows a USAF KC-10 military aircraft, during a mission of illegal aerosol.

a) It's not a fuel dumping (The KC-10 U.S.A.F. junction DC-10 doesn't have built-in fuel exhaust systems).
b) These are not aerodynamic contrails aerodynamic.
c) It's not a fake.
d) It's not a hoax.

The video produced by a naive military pilot and then published on the portal You-Tube, represents the best evidence currently available on the Web and as such must be considered, although the clumsy and instrumental attempts to deny by hoaxers. In this regard, we would like to conclude by noting that the user's channel You-Tube USAFFEKC1O appears now in effect under the control of Italian hoaxers.

This says a lot about the role of deniers, as part of the cover-up about chemtrails and co-operation of ItalianYou-Tube staff in this misinformation.

We thank friends, Tom Bosco and Fabio for their precious co-operation.

UPDATE: channel USAFFEKC10 was "reset" and "replaced" with a clone devoid of content whose last logon is traced back to a year ago, although we know that the user has inserted comments until a few hours ago. Everything looks bizarre and disturbing and at the same time, in the light of the latter "coup", it seems that the case of pilot U.S.A.F. dissident cannot yet be considered closed.

Previous articles about this topic:

- Too late, Tim (the case of the KC-10 in the skies)
- Mavericks

[1] Wingtip Vortices - [ LINK ] Wingtip vortices are tubes of circulating air which are left behind a wing as it generates lift. One wingtip vortex trails from the tip of each wing. The cores of vortices spin at very high speed and are regions of very low pressure. To first approximation, these low-pressure regions form with little exchange of heat with the neighboring regions i.e. adiabatically, so the local temperature in the low-pressure regions drops, too. If it drops below the local dew point, there results a condensation of water vapor present in the cores of wingtip vortices, making them visible. The temperature may even drop below the local freezing point, in which case ice crystals will form inside the cores.

Wingtip vortices are associated with induced drag, an essentially unavoidable side effect of the wing generating lift. Managing induced drag and wingtip vortices by selecting the best wing planform for the mission is critically important in aerospace engineering.

Wingtip vortices form the major component of wake turbulence.

1 comment:

  1. hard 2 get to huh,oo,,,maybe some print magazine wouldn't be so vulnerble to super secret double creepy. sensory censorship


Please, pay attention: every comment is under evaluation. So they won't appear immediately

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.